Tata is a reputed name in India with respect to ethics and national concern for the people. Dhamra project is undoing whatever good they’ve done till now and putting their name to shame. From an organization like TATA we expect responsible actions and decisions and not just monetary gain. Being a corporate organization it is understandable that they have their monetary concern, but never before, have I heard of them putting commercial aspect ahead of a cause.
It is common knowledge now that the port being constructed at Dhamra is encroaching on the habitat of Olive Ridley turtles (where they migrate annually) and many other species. We are also aware of the fact that despite many pleas neither government nor the company is willing to put a hold to their project, despite the fact that alternatives are present.
Now, I’m not a business person, so I don’t know much about the business aspect, but I do know that a project which is almost built on the land in such an environmentally sensitive and important area is not a good idea at all. How can a (so-called) responsible company like theirs not do complete research and take a decision of the land where they intend to build a multi-million dollar project? How can the government allow them to flaunt all the laws? Is this project going to be another example for others that they can break the rule and get away with it? Unfortunately, it seems so to me and I’m sure to many more.
If this project gets accomplished we’d have a lot more to pay than what we’re right now. Today TATA’s and L&T are building this commercial project tomorrow other’s will, because all they’d have to do is start building their project before the approval from the government comes, and by the time the government is able to come up to any sort of conclusion the project is 90 per cent complete, and then, thank you very much, we can’t do anything.
Today we’re going to probably end up losing existence of one of the specie on our land because of this project, tomorrow many more. And all this is happening because our government is too slow and too weak to take any substantial action.
Greenpeace briefing states that “There is prima facie evidence that construction at the Dhamra port commenced in violation of the Forest Conservation Act, as detailed in letter dated 5-5-2000 from Eastern Regional Office, MoEF to the PCCF (WL), Orissa. These violations have never been investigated or penalized.”
What is it that the government is waiting for? More rules or more proof? In either case, there are enough of both and it’s just about taking the right decision. I think it’s high time that government let the corporate know that who has an upper hand and that they can’t just go around flouting the rules without paying a price – in literal sense – not bribe, but fines.
There have been various changes in the project details official permission was given, the parameters have changed and unfortunately, not for good, but for worse. The port site was supposed to be on Kanika Sands, whereas the current site is now on the mainland. Initial proposed capacity was 20 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) whereas the proposed capacity is now 83 mtpa. Original project plan was to handle bulk carriers up to 120,000 deadweight tons (dwt); the revised plan proposes handling ships up to 180,000 dwt. And lastly, the depth of the shipping channel was for a vessel draft of 14 m. but this has now been changed to cater to vessels of 18.5 m draft, hence substantially greater dredging is required to be done.
The question is that if we as individuals can notice these details, and consciously feel that what is happening is wrong, then why can’t the company, or ministers feel it? Even if the Dharma port has to be demolished, I’d say it should be. And it must be kept as an example for other organizations who may think of following the path TATAs have taken, and know there is no end to their (faulty) means.
-Ritika Verma



