Save the turtles

adobe audition 1.5 cracked Download Adobe Audition 3 download adobe premiere elements adobe audition v1.5 crack Download Adobe Premiere Elements 8 keygen abbyy finereader 7.0 adobe audition 7.1 Download ABBYY FineReader 10 Professional Editionadobe audition 2 tryout adobe audition totally free Software download 2.0 adobe cd elements key premiere adobe audition 3.0 crack Download Adobe Captivate 4 microsoft streets and trips mexico plugins for adobe premiere elements 3.0 Download Microsoft Streets and Trips 2010 adobe premiere elements 3.0 trial

No end to means

Ritika

Ritika

Tata is a reputed name in India with respect to ethics and national concern for the people. Dhamra project is undoing whatever good they’ve done till now and putting their name to shame. From an organization like TATA we expect responsible actions and decisions and not just monetary gain. Being a corporate organization it is understandable that they have their monetary concern, but never before, have I heard of them putting commercial aspect ahead of a cause.

It is common knowledge now that the port being constructed at Dhamra is encroaching on the habitat of Olive Ridley turtles (where they migrate annually) and many other species. We are also aware of the fact that despite many pleas neither government nor the company is willing to put a hold to their project, despite the fact that alternatives are present.

Now, I’m not a business person, so I don’t know much about the business aspect, but I do know that a project which is almost built on the land in such an environmentally sensitive and important area is not a good idea at all. How can a (so-called) responsible company like theirs not do complete research and take a decision of the land where they intend to build a multi-million dollar project? How can the government allow them to flaunt all the laws? Is this project going to be another example for others that they can break the rule and get away with it? Unfortunately, it seems so to me and I’m sure to many more.

If this project gets accomplished we’d have a lot more to pay than what we’re right now. Today TATA’s and L&T are building this commercial project tomorrow other’s will, because all they’d have to do is start building their project before the approval from the government comes, and by the time the government is able to come up to any sort of conclusion the project is 90 per cent complete, and then, thank you very much, we can’t do anything.

Today we’re going to probably end up losing existence of one of the specie on our land because of this project, tomorrow many more. And all this is happening because our government is too slow and too weak to take any substantial action.

Greenpeace briefing states that “There is prima facie evidence that construction at the Dhamra port commenced in violation of the Forest Conservation Act, as detailed in letter dated 5-5-2000 from Eastern Regional Office, MoEF to the PCCF (WL), Orissa. These violations have never been investigated or penalized.”

What is it that the government is waiting for? More rules or more proof? In either case, there are enough of both and it’s just about taking the right decision. I think it’s high time that government let the corporate know that who has an upper hand and that they can’t just go around flouting the rules without paying a price – in literal sense – not bribe, but fines.

There have been various changes in the project details official permission was given, the parameters have changed and unfortunately, not for good, but for worse. The port site was supposed to be on Kanika Sands, whereas the current site is now on the mainland. Initial proposed capacity was 20 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) whereas the proposed capacity is now 83 mtpa. Original project plan was to handle bulk carriers up to 120,000 deadweight tons (dwt); the revised plan proposes handling ships up to 180,000 dwt. And lastly, the depth of the shipping channel was for a vessel draft of 14 m. but this has now been changed to cater to vessels of 18.5 m draft, hence substantially greater dredging is required to be done.

The question is that if we as individuals can notice these details, and consciously feel that what is happening is wrong, then why can’t the company, or ministers feel it? Even if the Dharma port has to be demolished, I’d say it should be. And it must be kept as an example for other organizations who may think of following the path TATAs have taken, and know there is no end to their (faulty) means.

-Ritika Verma


An ecosystem at stake

Rishabh

Rishabh

An estimated 1,40,000 species are becoming extinct every year, which is 383 species extinct everyday!! And 13 million hectares of forest being lost globally due to deforestation, which is 35616 hectares of forest lost every day!!!  Do we really want to add to these figures? At least I don’t.

But this is exactly what TATA, Larsen and Toubro, and the Indian government seem to be doing. Tata in collaboration with L&T is constructing a port in Dhamra, Orissa one of the largest in India. But the problem is its close proximity to the Gahirmatha Marine Sanctuary, which is the world’s largest remaining nesting ground for the Olive Ridley Sea turtle, a species classified as endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

Between 200,000 and 500,000 female turtles nest here every year, and the port is less than five kilometers from the boundaries of the Bhitarkanika National Park, which itself contains an abundance of rare wildlife species and an amazingly lush and biodiverse mangrove forest ecosystem, all of which are threatened by this port development scheme.

The location of the port also runs contrary to a 2002 directive of the Ministry of Environment, based on the government of India’s National Wildlife Action Plan, that a radius of 10 kms from all existing parks and sanctuaries be declared ‘eco-sensitive areas’ and large-scale industrial development be kept away from these areas. Additionally, the central governments own guidelines for industries ask that they be located at least 25 kms away from national parks or sancturies.

So what exactly are these people doing? By looking at these facts, we can clearly see how these companies and the government are much more interested in making money than in India’s environment and bio diversity, and it is the same environment which keeps us alive and we are simply going to endanger or harm it just in the name of development. What is development and it certainly does not mean anything if that development is endangering species in that area which would consequently harm us.

On June 8, 2007, Greenpeace released a scientific report prepared by the North Orissa University that unequivocally established the ecological significance of the mud flat ecosystem of the port site. The study makes the case that there is need for abundant caution, besides highlighting the high likelihood of turtles in the waters near Dhamra, which was later justified by satellite tracking studies by Wildlife Institute of India.

TATAs have always maintained that they will reconsider the port, if the evidence of turtles in the area is established. In addition, there are other significant findings, such as that the mudflats (actual port site) are a mating and nesting ground for Horseshoe crabs and a rare species of frog. But the company has refused to re-examine its plans, while continuing to maintain that they will not harm the environment or endangered species, without responding to either the specific concerns that are being raised or new evidence presented.

So even with concrete evidence of the perils of the development of the port in Dharma, the company has ignored them and now is only looking in its self interest rather than the whole interest of the community being affected by the development of the port.

Another issue is the probable impact on livelihoods of thousands of fishermen in the region. The construction of the port and dredging in particular could result in the destruction and pollution of breeding and spawning grounds of fish, leading to a situation where the fisherfolk cannot fish in their own local areas which would severely affect these people but still the state government of Orissa and the central government at Delhi is supporting the development.

The time to act is now, before it’s too late because the last hope is us, the ordinary people who have to come together to achieve something extra ordinary and stop the development of the port which is clearly damaging the environment and the diversity around it, we are the last hope for the survival of the Olive Ridley turtles, horseshoe crabs, the forest, livelihoods of the fishing community in that region and finally our survival because if this port succeeds in its development then later many more like this will come up, which  would surely be frowned upon but  it would be too late and then we would look back at these days when we could have done something , but we chose not to.

-Rishabh Gupta


There’s a life in those shells

Dona

Dona

It’s a wonderful feeling to go on turtle walks and see hope protected in the shells of these turtles.

Every year the Olive Ridley turtles make a difficult, long distance, trans-boundary migration from their resident feeding grounds to the nesting beaches to lay their eggs. But today mankind has taken over their nesting beaches, stolen their eggs, polluted and destroyed their habitats and relentlessly hunted them for their meat.

The destruction of oceans by trawling and over fishing in no fishing zones make these beautiful species suffer needlessly. It is terrible to see hundreds of turtle carcasses on the beach especially in Orissa. While the Government refuses to take action powerful corporate interests are moving into the zone. The Government has fabulous rules but zero infrastructures to enforce them.

The Dhamra port that has been built by the Tatas is one example of the capitalistic strive for profit, power and money which will cause massive decimation of the Olive Ridley’s. The port is built 5km from Bhitarkanika Sanctuary and less than 15km from Gahirmatha’s beaches which is one of the mass nesting sites of the Olive Ridley turtles in the world.

The port has violated the Forest Conservation Act 1980. Conservationists highlighted the port’s potential environment impacts when it was first proposed in 1990s. There were alternatives which the Tatas should have explored. The Dhamra port will push the Olive Ridley turtles one step closer to extinction.

Officials in the Ministry of Environment Forests have been aware of the Forest Act violation for several years, yet they turned their back to the issue. The matter has been before the Central Empowered committee of the Supreme Court since September 2009. The Orissa government has showed its dirty face by changing its stand and now denies that the port is being built on protected forest land. Jairam Ramesh is silent, and yet to take a stand on the violation of the Forest Conservation Act by the Dhamra Port.

Against such a scenario do the Turtles have a chance to survive into the next millennium?

The answer is big conditional ‘YES’. We the people especially the youth has to pressurise the Indian government to take protective measures. Humans are pushing turtles to extinction, and humans can save and give them their rightful place on the earth as well.

Development is turning the world into a graveyard. We cannot let another Dhamra port to destroy our biodiversity.

Act now!! Raise your voice to save one of the most beautiful harmless endangered species of the world Olive Ridley turtles. It’s worth the effort!

-         R. Dona Aideau


Turtles can’t speak, but YOU can

Shambhavi

Shambhavi

“Because the heart beats under a covering of hair, of fur, feathers, or wings, is it, for that reason, to be of no account?”
- Jean Paul Richter (German novelist & humorist, 1763-1825)

Or because the blood flows under scales or shells, or life lives under bark and leaves?
I’m asking this because the Dhamra Port is being allowed to come up. This just shows how we as humans disregard all other creatures who may be at risk, while we’re greedily chasing a good life.

There’s no reason why TATA and L&T should be hell-bent on that particular site, especially when they (as well as the ministries concerned) were well aware that the port’s location is within the 20km limit stipulated as out of bounds for mining/constructing activity in the Forest Conservation Act. In fact, it is about only 15 km away from the Gahirmata Sanctuary, a complete violation of the Act!

Anyone who paid the slightest attention to geography or physics lessons in primary school, could tell you that industrial effluents, oil spills and wastes from the port will easily flow down to the sanctuary and immediately cause the turtles and other marine life, a major problem.

A school student like me shouldn’t have to mention these rather obvious facts about soil and water contamination and air pollution going hand in hand with building factories and ports (judging by our very poor waste and infrastructure management system), but since most of these obvious issues were outright ignored, (by the adults who claim to have our future as top priority) I thought I ought to point these out to you.

Considering the potential ecological damage, these big companies should have pulled out immediately. And the Ministries concerned should have forced them to, if they didn’t. Instead, they appear to have plotted together greedily to let the damage happen!

India can manage very well with one less port, but I hate to think what the loss of another 1000 turtles will do to an already very fragile ecosystem (we are very much a part of ). Of course, even a million dead turtles would be a mere statistic for the industrialists and the ministries. The focus for them is some pseudo-notion of development, for humans only; and mind you, for just a few greedy, rich ones. How could they possibly be concerned about some slow moving, shelled creatures that could never make ‘proper’ use of land like we the ‘almighty humans’ can?

Now, all this sickens a whole lot of people including me. Of course we’re still a small fraction, so our voices get stamped out just like the poor innocent turtles. What’s worse is how Tata claims to be taking a green turn, when in fact, he really doesn’t care two hoots whose blood is smeared across his port, be it that of a turtle or the Irrawaddy dolphins or flamingos or crocodiles or even future generations of humans. As if the poor shelled creatures don’t have it bad already, what with tourists attempting joy rides on defenseless turtle-mothers while they’re laying their eggs! And here comes the big industry jing bang ready to make matters worse.

It’s a special kind of arrogance that comes with being human, the feeling that you can dictate terms to all other life forms regardless of how unreasonable or cruel those terms are. The main justification: “Animals can’t reason, can’t talk, they don’t matter.” A rather foolish thing to say since they do both, but more significantly, they can, and do suffer, like you and me.

I don’t suppose an industrialist would’ve stayed quiet for very long if his or her home was being destroyed and his or her children/family were being threatened. Unfortunately, the human justice system does a very shabby job of keeping the animals and plants safe.

That’s why all the people who have the sense to be worried about these creatures and the planet’s future, need to join together, step up and speak up, and more importantly, ACT – while we still have the time.

- Shambhavi


Coasts at stake!

As if Dharma was not enough, over 300 ports are coming up near biologically diverse coastal areas across the country.

Write to environment minister Jairam Ramesh and ask him to protect our coasts from permanent damage.



Facebook Fans

Last Users

Last users on Save the turtles!

Last Friends

Last friends on Save the turtles!
To see your friends on this site, you must be logged in with Facebook: