added acceleration support windows improved optimization Buy discounted Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Web Edition SP2 download windows media player version 11.0 delete windows mobile cache Buy discounted Microsoft Windows 7 Professional american crafstman storm windows disable games in windows xp Buy discounted Microsoft Office Visio Professional 2007 adobe photoshop 5.0 windows 98se ahead nero 6.6.0.6 keygen Buy discounted Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP3 creative windows start sound wav backpack parallel windows 98 Buy discounted McAfee Total Protection 2009 find out your windows cd key dutch windows vista Buy discounted Cyberlink PowerDVD 8 Ultra dst ch ange for windows xp curtains on bay windows Buy discounted Corel VideoStudio Pro X2 cannot access secure websites windows xp dual core processor windows xp support Buy discounted CorelDraw Graphics Suite X4 cannot open windows explorer xp energy star double payne windows Buy discounted Autodesk AutoCAD 2009 boot disk for windows 2000 professional default reader in windows vista Buy discounted Autodesk AutoCAD 2010 codec divx windows media player athlon duo windows Buy discounted Autodesk 3Ds Max Design 2009 custom windows mobile 6 install cheap windows xp oem Buy discounted Ahead Nero 9 do it youself window replacement windows energy efficient windows plants don't grow Buy discounted Microsoft Office 2003 Professional auditing windows xp best practice bypass windows passwords in win 2000 Buy discounted Microsoft Office 2007 Enterprise asr backup windows 2003

Tata can save the turtles


Dhamra port in violation of the Forest Conservation Act!

It is now clear that the scandal around the Dhamra port is even worse than we had thought. On Friday October 9, even as the construction machinery rumbled on at Dhamra, the Forest Bench of the Supreme Court of India issued notices to the Ministry of Environment and Forests and the state government of Orissa asking them to respond in an interlocutory application alleging violation of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

The application has been filed by conservationists Bittu Sahgal (Editor, Sanctuary Asia), Romulus Whitaker (Madras Crocodile Bank) and Shekar Dattatri (award winning wildlife film maker and member of the National Board for Wildlife) and names the Ministry of Environment and Forests and the Orissa state government as respondents.

The core of the case is that the entire port area is on designated forest land, and at no time was permission ever sought from the
Central Government to divert this land for other uses, as required by the Forest Conservation Act, 1980. Not only is this a huge legal
violation, it is also becoming clear that various officials in the Dhamra Port Company Limited, the Ministry of Environment and the
Orissa Forest Department have been aware of this for some time!

Despite this, no action has been taken by the state government to prosecute the violation. Shocking, but perhaps not surprising! And neither has DPCL or its owners (TATA Steel and L&T) taken responsibility for this violation.

The cat is out of the bag now, and we will know in a few weeks time what the governments involved – and DPCL and its masters – have to say in their defence. Watch this space for more as the story unfolds!

 

Turtles nest; port threat persists : Environmentalists

A file photo of turtles nesting

A file photo of turtles nesting

Bhubhaneshwar, India — Greenpeace welcomed the news of return of mass-nesting of Olive Ridley Turtles at Nasi Islands off the Gahirmatha coast. Reports available from the Department of Forests – Wildlife, Government of Orissa suggest that over 100,000 turtles nested en masse at Nasi 2 – Islands (1). The last two seasons have however also witnessed unusually severe erosion of the Gahirmatha Beaches. The length of the Nasi nesting beach has now shrunk to less than a kilometre, thereby significantly reducing the nesting habitat available for mass-nesting of the turtles in the region.

“We are absolutely delighted to see the turtles return to Gahirmatha in tune with their annual sojourn after giving the region a miss in 2007-2008 turtle season.” said Ashish Fernandes, Oceans Campaigner, Greenpeace India. “However, this episode of mass-nesting cannot be used as a smoke screen by port promoters in projecting that all is fine. It would be dangerous to assume so since this nesting does not mean that the turtles and the adjoining ecologically sensitive areas, including the Bitharkanika National Park are safe .Our concerns, shared by scientists, academics and other conservationists over ongoing dredging operations for construction of the Dhamra Port, and its impacts on the turtles and adjoining areas, remain (2). In the absence of any credible and comprehensive assessment of dredging and port construction activities on these areas, the significant ecological threat persists” he added. Continue reading…

 

Greenpeace files legal notice seeking unconditional apology and damages

Bhubaneswar, March 1, 2009: Environmental organisation Greenpeace has served a legal notice for defamation against Oriya daily Samaj, web portal orissadiary.com and the newspaper Nayabati. The notice is in response to a front page article in the Samaj’s Friday February 27, 2009 edition, and a version of the same which appeared on web portal orissadiary.com and in Nayabati on February 28, 2009. The Samaj article had alleged that Greenpeace (and other well known organizations working for turtle protection) have been infiltrated by terrorist elements, who might be considering and planning an attack under the guise of environmental protection. In its notice to the Samaj, Greenpeace has demanded an unconditional public apology and retraction and damages to the extent of Rs. 10 Crores within a period of 7 days, failing which it will approach the judiciary system and courts to seek a resolution on the same.

“It is disquieting that such a libelous and blatantly false article can appear without anyone questioning it. To label organizations working for the protection of Orissa’s environment and wildlife as terrorists or having terror links is not just libel, it is also clearly the work of people who do not have the best interests of the state or the country at heart. We are calling on the management of Samaj to conduct an enquiry into how this article was published, issue a public apology and name the parties responsible”, said Samit Aich, Executive Director, Greenpeace India. Continue reading…

 

Dhamra port controversy: dialogue fails, TATAs refuse to suspend dredging

Dredging continues posing irreversible impact on the area.

Dredging continues posing irreversible impact on the area.

Bangalore, February 26th, 2009: The dialogue between an alliance of environmental organisations with TATA Steel and other promoters of the Dhamra Port hit a dead end on February 20, 2009, after TATA refused to consider any suspension of dredging work at the port. TATA had earlier committed ‘in principle’ to an independent and comprehensive threat assessment. However, the promoters were unwilling to suspend critical elements of the construction, particularly dredging, which conservationists fear could be causing irreversible harm to the ecology. Suspension of dredging would be fundamental for any scientifically credible and meaningful study to be conducted.

“We find this reluctance to suspend dredging inconsistent with TATA Steel’s commitments to reconsider the project if an independent study were to indicate any environmental threat from the port” said Ashish Fernandes, Oceans Campaigner, Greenpeace. “It is illogical and dubious science to expect a biological assessment of the area to go on even as large scale habitat alteration from dredging and land filling continues” he added. Continue reading…

 

TATA shareholders question Dhamra port, company’s environmental performance

Gahirmathas seas are one of the worlds largest breeding areas for the Olive Ridley Turtle. The Dhamra port could signal the end of this habitat forever.

Gahirmatha's seas are one of the worlds largest breeding areas for the Olive Ridley Turtle. The Dhamra port could signal the end of this habitat forever.

Mumbai, India — Responding to these concerns, Mr. Tata said that he remained committed to reconsidering the Dhamra project if evidence of ecological significance was presented. Ironically, Greenpeace presented this evidence over a year ago via a study done by the North Orissa University (1). The Orissa state government and Dhamra Port Company Limited later attempted to discredit the report by leveling baseless allegations against Greenpeace (2). There was no reply from TATA to the scientific report presented in June 2007. Mr.Tata also attempted to dismiss Greenpeace’s online campaign by saying that the nearly one lakh emails sent were orchestrated. Shockingly, after their offer to dialogue on the controversial issue, Mr. Tata in a sudden turnaround at AGM, when reminded of an open, transparent, and on-record dialogue with him, refused to meet Greenpeace on this issue and said, “…meet Mr. B. Muthuraman or meet our lawyers”. This response summed up the TATA group’s demonstration of a complete lack of environmental sensitivity on this issue. Continue reading…

 



Sign-on for Greenpeace updates!

Your name *
Your email address *
Your phone number (receive SMS alerts)
Find Greenpeace India on FacebookJoin Greenpeace India on OrkutFollow us on TwitterRSS
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

In September 2008, after heightened protests and nearly 100,000 dedicated Greenpeace cyberactivists calling on TATA to relocate the port, the TATAs agreed to a dialogue with those opposing the Dhamra port. In the ensuing negotiations, TATA agreed 'in principle' to an independent assessment, yet it continues to build the port, and with every passing day, the turtles' future looks dimmer… That's why Greenpeace and other groups are calling on TATA to immediately halt construction and commission an independent assessment.

Photo gallery

Greenpeace activists blockade Bombay House Candles lit for Mr. Ratan Tata Dhamra Port Construction A Cormorant Greenpeace activists blockade Bombay House Greenpeace activists blockade Bombay House

Mr. Tata, look who's watching