added acceleration support windows improved optimization Buy discounted Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Web Edition SP2 download windows media player version 11.0 delete windows mobile cache Buy discounted Microsoft Windows 7 Professional american crafstman storm windows disable games in windows xp Buy discounted Microsoft Office Visio Professional 2007 adobe photoshop 5.0 windows 98se ahead nero 6.6.0.6 keygen Buy discounted Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP3 creative windows start sound wav backpack parallel windows 98 Buy discounted McAfee Total Protection 2009 find out your windows cd key dutch windows vista Buy discounted Cyberlink PowerDVD 8 Ultra dst ch ange for windows xp curtains on bay windows Buy discounted Corel VideoStudio Pro X2 cannot access secure websites windows xp dual core processor windows xp support Buy discounted CorelDraw Graphics Suite X4 cannot open windows explorer xp energy star double payne windows Buy discounted Autodesk AutoCAD 2009 boot disk for windows 2000 professional default reader in windows vista Buy discounted Autodesk AutoCAD 2010 codec divx windows media player athlon duo windows Buy discounted Autodesk 3Ds Max Design 2009 custom windows mobile 6 install cheap windows xp oem Buy discounted Ahead Nero 9 do it youself window replacement windows energy efficient windows plants don't grow Buy discounted Microsoft Office 2003 Professional auditing windows xp best practice bypass windows passwords in win 2000 Buy discounted Microsoft Office 2007 Enterprise asr backup windows 2003

Tata can save the turtles

Dhamra port controversy: dialogue fails, TATAs refuse to suspend dredging

Dredging continues posing irreversible impact on the area.

Dredging continues posing irreversible impact on the area.

Bangalore, February 26th, 2009: The dialogue between an alliance of environmental organisations with TATA Steel and other promoters of the Dhamra Port hit a dead end on February 20, 2009, after TATA refused to consider any suspension of dredging work at the port. TATA had earlier committed ‘in principle’ to an independent and comprehensive threat assessment. However, the promoters were unwilling to suspend critical elements of the construction, particularly dredging, which conservationists fear could be causing irreversible harm to the ecology. Suspension of dredging would be fundamental for any scientifically credible and meaningful study to be conducted.

“We find this reluctance to suspend dredging inconsistent with TATA Steel’s commitments to reconsider the project if an independent study were to indicate any environmental threat from the port” said Ashish Fernandes, Oceans Campaigner, Greenpeace. “It is illogical and dubious science to expect a biological assessment of the area to go on even as large scale habitat alteration from dredging and land filling continues” he added.

Last year there were heightened protests and over 100,000 Greenpeace cyber activists called on TATA to relocate the port. In response, at the Tata Steel AGM in August 2008, Mr. Ratan Tata committed to a dialogue process with Greenpeace and other organisations (1). The negotiations involved the need to suspend construction pending an independent and comprehensive biological threat assessment of the Dhamra Port on adjoining areas, including Gahirmatha and Bitharkanika. These protected areas harbour rare species such as the olive ridley turtle and the saltwater crocodile.

Commenting on the impasse, Belinda Wright, Executive Director, Wildlife Protection Society of India said, “The TATAs’ reluctance to suspend dredging does not make sense as this would create a fait accompli situation and prejudice the results of any assessment. Stopping the dredging is essential for any study to be meaningful, as this may be causing irreversible impacts on the area and could even be preventing the turtles from nesting.”

Recently, a Greenpeace snap-poll of nearly 5000 TATA customers, conducted between February 16th and February 24th revealed that 98% believed that port construction should be stopped immediately. MPs and politicians across party lines have also written to the Ministry of Environment at the Centre, raising concerns over the port’s impacts and seeking its intervention.(2)

“It seems that while TATAs are making positive statements, they are unwilling to back these up on the ground. We are still hopeful that the TATAs will demonstrate as much concern for the health of the environment as they do for their balance sheets. The best way to do this is by suspending construction, specifically dredging, pending the independent impact assessment that is needed”, Fernandes concluded.

Notes to the Editor
(1) The organisations interacting with TATA include the Wildlife Protection Society of India, Wildlife Society of Orissa, the National Fishworkers Forum and the Orissa Traditional Fishworkers Forum, Sanctuary Asia, Conservation Action Trust and Reefwatch Marine Conservation amongst others.

(2) For letters from MPs and other stakeholders to the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, expressing concern on the development of the Dhamra Port, please refer to http://greenpeace.in/turtle/docs

Ashish Fernandes, Oceans Campaigner, Greenpeace India
ashish.fernandes(at)greenpeace(dot)org, +91-99801 9930

Ankur Ganguly, Communications Manager, Greenpeace India
ankur.ganguly(at)greenpeace(dot)org, +91-98453 73818

Saumya Tripathi, Greenpeace Communications
saumya.tripathi(at)greenpeace(dot)org, +91-93438 62212

[Post to Twitter] 


This post is tagged , , , , , , , ,

9 Responses

  1. ashok pai says:

    vote with your money. buy marutis instead of TATA cars. ignore the TATA, and then they will know. even if its one ruppee less of profit, its a small but significant impact on TATA revenue. they are already under a a loss of a stagerring 1 trillion rupees, make that 2 trillion!

  2. [...] Also read: Tatas refuse to stop dredging [...]

  3. [...] Also read: Tatas refuse to stop dredging [...]

  4. Matt says:

    You haven’t been reading eco-dhamra.com have you? Why let facts spoil a good old yarn.

  5. sanjay says:

    I think Ahsis and others should have a moral to answer the Qs at following link , if they are serious about SAVING turtles.
    Greenpeace is already a scandal here in Orissa for the stealing and manipulating the university documents.Its time for greenpeace to react than showing us new celebraties supporting them every now and then.This is medio core hypocracy.
    Sanjay

  6. sanjay says:

    Its ok your site doesnt permit that LINK..that shows how biased is GREENPEACE!!!!

    we all know you guys have cybersmart techies ha ha!

  7. sumit says:

    orissa have no port.. people are poor.. what green peace have to say

  8. Ashish says:

    Matt and Sanjay, if you have specific facts you wish to challenge the Dhamra campaign on, please do write to me and let me know. Eco Dhamra site is put up by DPCL, as it clearly says, so I would caution you to exercise the same discretion about accepting “facts” on them as you would with the Greenpeace site. Please verify everything, whether it comes from Greenpeace or the TATAs/DPCL.

Leave a Reply





Sign-on for Greenpeace updates!

Your name *
Your email address *
Your phone number (receive SMS alerts)
Find Greenpeace India on FacebookJoin Greenpeace India on OrkutFollow us on TwitterRSS
SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

In September 2008, after heightened protests and nearly 100,000 dedicated Greenpeace cyberactivists calling on TATA to relocate the port, the TATAs agreed to a dialogue with those opposing the Dhamra port. In the ensuing negotiations, TATA agreed 'in principle' to an independent assessment, yet it continues to build the port, and with every passing day, the turtles' future looks dimmer… That's why Greenpeace and other groups are calling on TATA to immediately halt construction and commission an independent assessment.

Photo gallery

Turtles at Tata AIG Greenpeace activists blockade Bombay House The arribada Crab, at Bhitarkanika Dhamra Port Construction Candles lit for Mr. Ratan Tata

Mr. Tata, look who's watching